<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (2) TMI 784 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766237</link>
    <description>An assessment order under the GST regime is invalid if it is not signed by the assessing officer; the signature is treated as an essential element of a valid order. Sections 160 and 169 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 do not cure the defect of an unsigned assessment order. The unsigned Form VAT-203 assessment order was therefore quashed, while the authority was left free to make a fresh assessment after notice and by issuing a duly signed order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2025 14:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=799574" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (2) TMI 784 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766237</link>
      <description>An assessment order under the GST regime is invalid if it is not signed by the assessing officer; the signature is treated as an essential element of a valid order. Sections 160 and 169 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 do not cure the defect of an unsigned assessment order. The unsigned Form VAT-203 assessment order was therefore quashed, while the authority was left free to make a fresh assessment after notice and by issuing a duly signed order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766237</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>