<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (2) TMI 787 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766240</link>
    <description>HC set aside the impugned assessment order dated 30.08.2024 only insofar as disputed security wages, finding failure to afford a personal hearing on that issue and that the show cause notice did not raise security wages separately. The matter is remanded to the 1st respondent for fresh consideration of security wages. The petitioner is granted liberty to appeal other aspects of the order, but the HC cautioned against piecemeal appeals. The petition is disposed by remand.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2025 14:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=799571" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (2) TMI 787 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766240</link>
      <description>HC set aside the impugned assessment order dated 30.08.2024 only insofar as disputed security wages, finding failure to afford a personal hearing on that issue and that the show cause notice did not raise security wages separately. The matter is remanded to the 1st respondent for fresh consideration of security wages. The petitioner is granted liberty to appeal other aspects of the order, but the HC cautioned against piecemeal appeals. The petition is disposed by remand.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766240</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>