https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766245 An appeal rejected for non-compliance with the mandatory pre-deposit condition was found unsustainable once the required deposit had subsequently been made good. The court noted that, because the defect in maintainability had been cured, the rejection order could not stand. It did not examine the merits of the underlying dispute and instead required the appellate authority to consider the appeal afresh in accordance with law. The rejection order was therefore quashed and the matter remitted for fresh disposal. en-us Tue, 18 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 20 Feb 2025 08:02:32 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766245 An appeal rejected for non-compliance with the mandatory pre-deposit condition was found unsustainable once the required deposit had subsequently been made good. The court noted that, because the defect in maintainability had been cured, the rejection order could not stand. It did not examine the merits of the underlying dispute and instead required the appellate authority to consider the appeal afresh in accordance with law. The rejection order was therefore quashed and the matter remitted for fresh disposal. Case-Laws GST Tue, 18 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766245