https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41420 The article explains that converted cotton spindles fitted with gill boxes and used for worsted yarn fell within the intended scope of the regularisation scheme, so refusal to regularise them was unsustainable. It further states that clause 3(1) of the Woollen Textiles Control Order was invalid because it vested unguided discretion in the Textile Commissioner without standards, offending Articles 14 and 19(1)(g). For the same reason, the second proviso to rule 174 of the Central Excise Rules was also held invalid and inoperative. The writ petitions succeeded and the refusal to regularise was quashed. en-us Fri, 15 Dec 1978 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 03 Jun 2010 10:37:53 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41420 The article explains that converted cotton spindles fitted with gill boxes and used for worsted yarn fell within the intended scope of the regularisation scheme, so refusal to regularise them was unsustainable. It further states that clause 3(1) of the Woollen Textiles Control Order was invalid because it vested unguided discretion in the Textile Commissioner without standards, offending Articles 14 and 19(1)(g). For the same reason, the second proviso to rule 174 of the Central Excise Rules was also held invalid and inoperative. The writ petitions succeeded and the refusal to regularise was quashed. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 15 Dec 1978 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41420