https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41397 The court dismissed the petition, upholding the validity of Notification No. 68/63, finding that the power of seizure was not wrongfully exercised, and determining that Section 110(3) of the Customs Act, 1962, was constitutional and did not violate Articles 14 and 19(1)(g) of the Constitution. The petitioners were directed to bear the costs of the case. en-us Mon, 18 Jan 1982 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 02 Jun 2010 17:21:56 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41397 The court dismissed the petition, upholding the validity of Notification No. 68/63, finding that the power of seizure was not wrongfully exercised, and determining that Section 110(3) of the Customs Act, 1962, was constitutional and did not violate Articles 14 and 19(1)(g) of the Constitution. The petitioners were directed to bear the costs of the case. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 18 Jan 1982 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41397