<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1983 (8) TMI 55 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41395</link>
    <description>The court found that the show cause notice was not validly served within the required period as mandated by Section 110(2) of the Customs Act, 1962. As a result, the court allowed the writ petition, set aside the seizure of the goods, and directed the respondents to return the seized goods to the petitioners. The proceedings for confiscation of the goods and imposition of penalties were quashed, and the petitioners were awarded costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Aug 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Jun 2010 17:07:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=79926" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1983 (8) TMI 55 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41395</link>
      <description>The court found that the show cause notice was not validly served within the required period as mandated by Section 110(2) of the Customs Act, 1962. As a result, the court allowed the writ petition, set aside the seizure of the goods, and directed the respondents to return the seized goods to the petitioners. The proceedings for confiscation of the goods and imposition of penalties were quashed, and the petitioners were awarded costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Aug 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41395</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>