<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1983 (4) TMI 54 - HIGH COURT OF GOA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41394</link>
    <description>The court directed the respondents to refund the Excise Duty amount of Rs. 17,72,048.75 to the petitioner within two months. The court rejected arguments on exhaustion of appeal remedies, unjust enrichment, and the limitation period under Section 11B, allowing the refund despite statutory limitations. The court also denied an oral application for a certificate under Article 133(1)(a) for involving a substantial question of law of general importance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Jun 2010 17:04:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=79925" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1983 (4) TMI 54 - HIGH COURT OF GOA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41394</link>
      <description>The court directed the respondents to refund the Excise Duty amount of Rs. 17,72,048.75 to the petitioner within two months. The court rejected arguments on exhaustion of appeal remedies, unjust enrichment, and the limitation period under Section 11B, allowing the refund despite statutory limitations. The court also denied an oral application for a certificate under Article 133(1)(a) for involving a substantial question of law of general importance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41394</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>