<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1983 (8) TMI 54 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41392</link>
    <description>Rule 223A of the Central Excise Rules required the proper officer to account for receipts and deliveries and to grant a reasonable allowance for waste by evaporation or other natural causes. That discretion had to be exercised reasonably in light of the normal course of manufacture and storage. On the facts, breakage of vacuum flask refills was a natural incident of the business, and refusal of any allowance merely because no day-to-day breakage register was produced was irrational, especially when no statutory provision required such a register. The demand raised on disallowance of breakage was therefore unsustainable and was set aside in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Aug 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Jun 2010 16:54:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=79923" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1983 (8) TMI 54 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41392</link>
      <description>Rule 223A of the Central Excise Rules required the proper officer to account for receipts and deliveries and to grant a reasonable allowance for waste by evaporation or other natural causes. That discretion had to be exercised reasonably in light of the normal course of manufacture and storage. On the facts, breakage of vacuum flask refills was a natural incident of the business, and refusal of any allowance merely because no day-to-day breakage register was produced was irrational, especially when no statutory provision required such a register. The demand raised on disallowance of breakage was therefore unsustainable and was set aside in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Aug 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41392</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>