<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (10) TMI 1634 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460775</link>
    <description>Foreign tax credit could not be denied merely because Form No. 67 was not filed along with the return under section 139(1). Rule 128(9) was treated as directory, intended to implement the foreign tax credit mechanism under section 90, so delayed filing of the form did not by itself justify rejection of the claim. The denial was set aside, subject to verification of Form No. 67.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Feb 2025 19:03:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=799167" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (10) TMI 1634 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460775</link>
      <description>Foreign tax credit could not be denied merely because Form No. 67 was not filed along with the return under section 139(1). Rule 128(9) was treated as directory, intended to implement the foreign tax credit mechanism under section 90, so delayed filing of the form did not by itself justify rejection of the claim. The denial was set aside, subject to verification of Form No. 67.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460775</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>