<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (11) TMI 1428 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460777</link>
    <description>Foreign Tax Credit under section 90 cannot be denied merely because Form No. 67 was furnished after filing the return of income. Rule 128(9) was treated as directory for the relevant assessment years, so the procedural delay in filing the form did not defeat the substantive entitlement to credit. The credit remained subject to verification of Form No. 67, but delayed compliance alone was not sufficient to reject the claim.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2025 10:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=799165" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (11) TMI 1428 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460777</link>
      <description>Foreign Tax Credit under section 90 cannot be denied merely because Form No. 67 was furnished after filing the return of income. Rule 128(9) was treated as directory for the relevant assessment years, so the procedural delay in filing the form did not defeat the substantive entitlement to credit. The credit remained subject to verification of Form No. 67, but delayed compliance alone was not sufficient to reject the claim.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460777</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>