https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=34398 The Supreme Court characterised repeated transfer petitions by the incarcerated petitioner as an abuse of process and declined to entertain the Article 32 writ, noting prior dismissals of substantially similar applications. While not expressing a view on the merits, the Court observed that successive filings claiming changed circumstances amounted to misuse of constitutional remedies; the petitioner asserted Article 21 rights and alleged coercive surveillance, seeking transfer outside specified jurisdictions, but the bench emphasised balancing asserted fundamental rights against public safety and prior judicial findings. en-us Tue, 18 Feb 2025 13:16:03 +0530 Tue, 18 Feb 2025 13:16:03 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=34398 The Supreme Court characterised repeated transfer petitions by the incarcerated petitioner as an abuse of process and declined to entertain the Article 32 writ, noting prior dismissals of substantially similar applications. While not expressing a view on the merits, the Court observed that successive filings claiming changed circumstances amounted to misuse of constitutional remedies; the petitioner asserted Article 21 rights and alleged coercive surveillance, seeking transfer outside specified jurisdictions, but the bench emphasised balancing asserted fundamental rights against public safety and prior judicial findings. News - Tue, 18 Feb 2025 13:16:03 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=34398