<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (2) TMI 629 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766082</link>
    <description>CESTAT Kolkata held that Revenue cannot assume all receipts and payments constitute taxable services without identifying specific service categories. The case involved service tax demands on bank transfers and debtor ledger credits. The tribunal found discrepancies in intra-bank transfer deductions (Rs.9,45,56,790/- deducted instead of claimed Rs.11,11,34,154/-) accepted by Revenue. Matter remanded to adjudicating authority for re-quantification of taxable value and proper reconciliation of service tax liability based on appellant&#039;s detailed submissions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Feb 2025 08:10:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=798935" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (2) TMI 629 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766082</link>
      <description>CESTAT Kolkata held that Revenue cannot assume all receipts and payments constitute taxable services without identifying specific service categories. The case involved service tax demands on bank transfers and debtor ledger credits. The tribunal found discrepancies in intra-bank transfer deductions (Rs.9,45,56,790/- deducted instead of claimed Rs.11,11,34,154/-) accepted by Revenue. Matter remanded to adjudicating authority for re-quantification of taxable value and proper reconciliation of service tax liability based on appellant&#039;s detailed submissions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766082</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>