<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (2) TMI 663 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766116</link>
    <description>An order cancelling GST registration was interfered with because it did not show consideration of the taxpayer&#039;s reply to the show cause notice. The HC held that the matter required fresh consideration by the proper authority on merits rather than final determination in writ proceedings. The case was remitted for a new order within the stipulated time, and the registration was directed to remain under suspension until that order is passed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Feb 2025 08:10:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=798901" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (2) TMI 663 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766116</link>
      <description>An order cancelling GST registration was interfered with because it did not show consideration of the taxpayer&#039;s reply to the show cause notice. The HC held that the matter required fresh consideration by the proper authority on merits rather than final determination in writ proceedings. The case was remitted for a new order within the stipulated time, and the registration was directed to remain under suspension until that order is passed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766116</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>