<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1973 (9) TMI 55 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41359</link>
    <description>Where an accused&#039;s statement contains distinct and severable inculpatory and exculpatory parts, the court may rely on the inculpatory admission while rejecting the improbable exculpatory version. The police evidence accepted by the trial court and High Court was found reliable, and the statement was treated as voluntary because nothing showed compulsion. On that basis, the conviction under the Sea Customs Act was sustained and the challenge to reliance on Article 20 failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 1973 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2018 17:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=79890" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1973 (9) TMI 55 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41359</link>
      <description>Where an accused&#039;s statement contains distinct and severable inculpatory and exculpatory parts, the court may rely on the inculpatory admission while rejecting the improbable exculpatory version. The police evidence accepted by the trial court and High Court was found reliable, and the statement was treated as voluntary because nothing showed compulsion. On that basis, the conviction under the Sea Customs Act was sustained and the challenge to reliance on Article 20 failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 1973 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41359</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>