https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41358 The Supreme Court held that the extension order under the Customs Act was legal due to special agreements and consent orders between parties, which waived the right to contest it. The Court found no violation of natural justice as the appellants had waived their right to be heard. The agreements also prevented the return of deposited amounts. The appellants lacked standing to seek release of goods held by the Bank. The appeals were dismissed, with each party bearing its costs, emphasizing the need for adjudication proceedings to proceed promptly. en-us Thu, 08 Nov 1973 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 06 Aug 2014 13:06:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41358 The Supreme Court held that the extension order under the Customs Act was legal due to special agreements and consent orders between parties, which waived the right to contest it. The Court found no violation of natural justice as the appellants had waived their right to be heard. The agreements also prevented the return of deposited amounts. The appellants lacked standing to seek release of goods held by the Bank. The appeals were dismissed, with each party bearing its costs, emphasizing the need for adjudication proceedings to proceed promptly. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 08 Nov 1973 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41358