<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1971 (2) TMI 41 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41352</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court affirmed that the power of the Collector of Customs under the proviso to Section 110(2) of the Customs Act, 1962 is quasi-judicial and requires a judicial approach. The Court held that an opportunity to be heard must be granted before extending the time for issuing a notice under Section 124(a). The appeal was dismissed, upholding the Division Bench&#039;s judgment and emphasizing the necessity for a fair procedure in exercising the power to extend time in customs matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 1971 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Aug 2014 17:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=79883" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1971 (2) TMI 41 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41352</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court affirmed that the power of the Collector of Customs under the proviso to Section 110(2) of the Customs Act, 1962 is quasi-judicial and requires a judicial approach. The Court held that an opportunity to be heard must be granted before extending the time for issuing a notice under Section 124(a). The appeal was dismissed, upholding the Division Bench&#039;s judgment and emphasizing the necessity for a fair procedure in exercising the power to extend time in customs matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 1971 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41352</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>