<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (9) TMI 1696 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460762</link>
    <description>A co-operative society engaged in providing banking or credit facilities to its members remained substantively eligible for deduction under section 80P(2)(a)(i), and that benefit could not be denied merely because the claim was made under a wrong clause in the return due to inadvertence. Section 80A(5) was held inapplicable on these facts, so it did not bar the otherwise legitimate deduction. The authorities were not justified in refusing the deduction when the underlying entitlement under the Act was undisputed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Feb 2025 11:02:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=798756" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (9) TMI 1696 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460762</link>
      <description>A co-operative society engaged in providing banking or credit facilities to its members remained substantively eligible for deduction under section 80P(2)(a)(i), and that benefit could not be denied merely because the claim was made under a wrong clause in the return due to inadvertence. Section 80A(5) was held inapplicable on these facts, so it did not bar the otherwise legitimate deduction. The authorities were not justified in refusing the deduction when the underlying entitlement under the Act was undisputed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460762</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>