<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (2) TMI 590 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766044</link>
    <description>Supplying labour on a daily basis for loading and unloading trucks/LCVs did not fall within the statutory meaning of manpower recruitment or supply agency service, because the activity was merely labour supply for work and not recruitment or supply of manpower to another person; no service tax was payable on that basis. A demand also could not be sustained on the new appellate ground that tax had been collected from the client and not deposited, because that factual basis was neither alleged in the show cause notice nor recorded in the original adjudication order; the appellate finding was therefore unsustainable. The demand, penalty and related adverse findings were set aside, and the appeal was allowed with consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Feb 2025 08:48:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=798691" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (2) TMI 590 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766044</link>
      <description>Supplying labour on a daily basis for loading and unloading trucks/LCVs did not fall within the statutory meaning of manpower recruitment or supply agency service, because the activity was merely labour supply for work and not recruitment or supply of manpower to another person; no service tax was payable on that basis. A demand also could not be sustained on the new appellate ground that tax had been collected from the client and not deposited, because that factual basis was neither alleged in the show cause notice nor recorded in the original adjudication order; the appellate finding was therefore unsustainable. The demand, penalty and related adverse findings were set aside, and the appeal was allowed with consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766044</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>