https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766049 Territorial jurisdiction under Article 226(2) turns on whether an integral part of the cause of action arose within the Court's limits, not on a merely incidental connection. Where the relevant banking communications, settlement proposals and the earlier challenge to the fraud classification were all tied to the New Delhi branch and had already been litigated before the Delhi High Court, the later writ in Bombay was treated as forum shopping. Applying forum conveniens and judicial propriety, the Court held that the Delhi High Court was the proper forum and declined to entertain the petition, while granting liberty to approach the Delhi High Court. en-us Fri, 31 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 17 Feb 2025 08:48:32 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766049 Territorial jurisdiction under Article 226(2) turns on whether an integral part of the cause of action arose within the Court's limits, not on a merely incidental connection. Where the relevant banking communications, settlement proposals and the earlier challenge to the fraud classification were all tied to the New Delhi branch and had already been litigated before the Delhi High Court, the later writ in Bombay was treated as forum shopping. Applying forum conveniens and judicial propriety, the Court held that the Delhi High Court was the proper forum and declined to entertain the petition, while granting liberty to approach the Delhi High Court. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 31 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766049