<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (2) TMI 597 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766051</link>
    <description>A challenge to CESTAT orders setting aside Office Memorandums concerning anti-dumping duty became infructuous after the domestic industry stated that it no longer pressed its rights based on the DGTR recommendation and did not pursue imposition of anti-dumping duty. In that background, the Union&#039;s jurisdictional question on whether CESTAT can set aside an Office Memorandum was treated as moot, and the writ petitions were disposed of as infructuous.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Feb 2025 13:02:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=798684" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (2) TMI 597 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766051</link>
      <description>A challenge to CESTAT orders setting aside Office Memorandums concerning anti-dumping duty became infructuous after the domestic industry stated that it no longer pressed its rights based on the DGTR recommendation and did not pursue imposition of anti-dumping duty. In that background, the Union&#039;s jurisdictional question on whether CESTAT can set aside an Office Memorandum was treated as moot, and the writ petitions were disposed of as infructuous.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766051</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>