<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (4) TMI 1656 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460758</link>
    <description>The Court allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, directing the AO to delete the income addition based on a void contract. It held that tax liability should be determined by real income, not book entries. The contract, declared void ab initio, resulted in no real income accruing to the assessee. The judgment clarified that contracts entered without Board consent are voidable for companies with certain share capital, and emphasized that tax should reflect actual income, not accounting entries.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Feb 2025 17:39:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=798601" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (4) TMI 1656 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460758</link>
      <description>The Court allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, directing the AO to delete the income addition based on a void contract. It held that tax liability should be determined by real income, not book entries. The contract, declared void ab initio, resulted in no real income accruing to the assessee. The judgment clarified that contracts entered without Board consent are voidable for companies with certain share capital, and emphasized that tax should reflect actual income, not accounting entries.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460758</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>