<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1981 (7) TMI 79 - HIGH COURT OF MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41326</link>
    <description>The court allowed the writ petitions, ruling that the goods were exempt from customs duty as per the notification in force when they entered territorial waters. The rule nisi was made absolute, with no order as to costs. This decision emphasizes the significance of the entry date into territorial waters in determining customs duty liability and clarifies the disparity between chargeability and assessment under the Customs Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Jun 2010 10:51:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=79857" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1981 (7) TMI 79 - HIGH COURT OF MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41326</link>
      <description>The court allowed the writ petitions, ruling that the goods were exempt from customs duty as per the notification in force when they entered territorial waters. The rule nisi was made absolute, with no order as to costs. This decision emphasizes the significance of the entry date into territorial waters in determining customs duty liability and clarifies the disparity between chargeability and assessment under the Customs Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41326</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>