<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Trade Payables Outstanding Since 2011 and Fixed Asset Investment Under Section 41(1) and 69 Not Taxable</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=85764</link>
    <description>ITAT reversed additions made under sections 41(1) and 69 of Income Tax Act. Regarding s.41(1), outstanding trade payables to supplier since FY 2011-12 for defective materials were consistently shown in books, with no cessation of liability established. Following precedent, mere non-payment without remission does not satisfy s.41(1) requirements. Previous ITAT ruling for AY 2012-13 had already examined creditor authenticity. On s.69 addition, demand draft for land registration was properly recorded as fixed asset in FY 2014-15 books, negating unexplained investment presumption. Revenue&#039;s contradictory position in subsequent year deemed improper. Appeal allowed with both additions deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 15 Feb 2025 08:00:46 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Feb 2025 08:00:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=798516" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Trade Payables Outstanding Since 2011 and Fixed Asset Investment Under Section 41(1) and 69 Not Taxable</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=85764</link>
      <description>ITAT reversed additions made under sections 41(1) and 69 of Income Tax Act. Regarding s.41(1), outstanding trade payables to supplier since FY 2011-12 for defective materials were consistently shown in books, with no cessation of liability established. Following precedent, mere non-payment without remission does not satisfy s.41(1) requirements. Previous ITAT ruling for AY 2012-13 had already examined creditor authenticity. On s.69 addition, demand draft for land registration was properly recorded as fixed asset in FY 2014-15 books, negating unexplained investment presumption. Revenue&#039;s contradictory position in subsequent year deemed improper. Appeal allowed with both additions deleted.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 15 Feb 2025 08:00:46 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=85764</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>