<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Show Cause Notices Invalidated Due to Missing Mandatory Pre-Notice Consultation Under Master Circular 2017</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=85757</link>
    <description>HC quashed multiple show cause notices (SCNs) due to lack of mandatory pre-SCN consultation as required under Master Circular dated March 10, 2017. The court found the SCNs vague and lacking reference to petitioners&#039; contentions raised during pre-consultation. In one case (SCA 5685/2022), though the SCN contained liability elements, it merely highlighted discrepancies between Form 26AS and ST-3 returns. The subsequent Order-in-Original was also set aside. Department retains liberty to initiate fresh proceedings or revive original SCNs subject to Supreme Court&#039;s pending decision. The ruling emphasizes that absence of pre-SCN consultation is fatal to notice validity, following precedent set in L&amp;T Hydrocarbon Engineering Ltd. case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 15 Feb 2025 08:00:46 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Feb 2025 08:00:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=798509" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Show Cause Notices Invalidated Due to Missing Mandatory Pre-Notice Consultation Under Master Circular 2017</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=85757</link>
      <description>HC quashed multiple show cause notices (SCNs) due to lack of mandatory pre-SCN consultation as required under Master Circular dated March 10, 2017. The court found the SCNs vague and lacking reference to petitioners&#039; contentions raised during pre-consultation. In one case (SCA 5685/2022), though the SCN contained liability elements, it merely highlighted discrepancies between Form 26AS and ST-3 returns. The subsequent Order-in-Original was also set aside. Department retains liberty to initiate fresh proceedings or revive original SCNs subject to Supreme Court&#039;s pending decision. The ruling emphasizes that absence of pre-SCN consultation is fatal to notice validity, following precedent set in L&amp;T Hydrocarbon Engineering Ltd. case.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 15 Feb 2025 08:00:46 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=85757</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>