<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (2) TMI 564 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI - LB</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766018</link>
    <description>NCLAT Principal Bench dismissed appeal challenging rejection of application to submit alternative resolution plan. Corporate debtor&#039;s resolution plan was already approved by Committee of Creditors and pending adjudicating authority&#039;s approval. Tribunal held that once CoC approves a resolution plan, it becomes binding inter se parties per SC precedent in Ebix Singapore case, and CoC cannot consider alternative plans. Despite appellant&#039;s argument that approved plan became unimplementable due to JV partner withdrawal, NCLAT ruled appellant lacked authority to submit new resolution plan after CoC&#039;s binding approval.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Feb 2025 08:00:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=798486" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (2) TMI 564 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI - LB</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766018</link>
      <description>NCLAT Principal Bench dismissed appeal challenging rejection of application to submit alternative resolution plan. Corporate debtor&#039;s resolution plan was already approved by Committee of Creditors and pending adjudicating authority&#039;s approval. Tribunal held that once CoC approves a resolution plan, it becomes binding inter se parties per SC precedent in Ebix Singapore case, and CoC cannot consider alternative plans. Despite appellant&#039;s argument that approved plan became unimplementable due to JV partner withdrawal, NCLAT ruled appellant lacked authority to submit new resolution plan after CoC&#039;s binding approval.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766018</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>