<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Important cases heard by Supreme Court on February 14</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=34137</link>
    <description>Petitions engaged administrative accountability and transparency, including pleas to bring major political parties under the Right to Information to curb illicit electoral funding and a challenge seeking implementation of the Places of Worship (Special Provisions) Act, 1991 to preserve religious character as of the historical benchmark, while a review of a prior decision on telecom liability under the Adjusted Gross Revenue framework was declined.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Feb 2025 22:46:03 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Feb 2025 22:46:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=798457" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Important cases heard by Supreme Court on February 14</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=34137</link>
      <description>Petitions engaged administrative accountability and transparency, including pleas to bring major political parties under the Right to Information to curb illicit electoral funding and a challenge seeking implementation of the Places of Worship (Special Provisions) Act, 1991 to preserve religious character as of the historical benchmark, while a review of a prior decision on telecom liability under the Adjusted Gross Revenue framework was declined.</description>
      <category>News</category>
      <law>-</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Feb 2025 22:46:03 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=34137</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>