https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41311 Writ jurisdiction does not extend to reassessing the adequacy or sufficiency of material supporting statutory authorisation for search and seizure where relevant material exists and the authorities act within their powers. The Calcutta HC held that the challenge to authorisation under the Gold Control Act and seizure under the Customs Act and Gold Control Act could not succeed on grounds of lack of authority or insufficiency of material. The competent statutory authorities retained exclusive jurisdiction to investigate the nature of the seized goods and the petitioners' right to possession, and the writ petition was dismissed. en-us Wed, 08 Nov 1978 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 02 Jun 2010 09:45:33 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41311 Writ jurisdiction does not extend to reassessing the adequacy or sufficiency of material supporting statutory authorisation for search and seizure where relevant material exists and the authorities act within their powers. The Calcutta HC held that the challenge to authorisation under the Gold Control Act and seizure under the Customs Act and Gold Control Act could not succeed on grounds of lack of authority or insufficiency of material. The competent statutory authorities retained exclusive jurisdiction to investigate the nature of the seized goods and the petitioners' right to possession, and the writ petition was dismissed. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 08 Nov 1978 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41311