https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41307 The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, ordering the Department to return the seized T.V. set due to non-compliance with statutory provisions under the Customs Act. The Department failed to pass necessary orders within the required timeframe, leading to the dismissal of allegations of smuggling against the petitioner. Costs were awarded to the petitioner, highlighting the Department's procedural delays and lack of concrete evidence supporting their claims. en-us Tue, 15 Sep 1981 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 01 Jun 2010 19:00:40 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41307 The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, ordering the Department to return the seized T.V. set due to non-compliance with statutory provisions under the Customs Act. The Department failed to pass necessary orders within the required timeframe, leading to the dismissal of allegations of smuggling against the petitioner. Costs were awarded to the petitioner, highlighting the Department's procedural delays and lack of concrete evidence supporting their claims. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 15 Sep 1981 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41307