<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1983 (3) TMI 51 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYD.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41305</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed, and a Writ of Certiorari was issued to quash the orders of the Central Government and the lower authorities. The court held that &#039;lozenges&#039; should not be classified under &#039;candy&#039; for excise purposes, emphasizing the importance of local trade understanding and standards over foreign interpretations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Jun 2010 18:47:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=79836" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1983 (3) TMI 51 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYD.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41305</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed, and a Writ of Certiorari was issued to quash the orders of the Central Government and the lower authorities. The court held that &#039;lozenges&#039; should not be classified under &#039;candy&#039; for excise purposes, emphasizing the importance of local trade understanding and standards over foreign interpretations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41305</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>