https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41295 A fiscal challenge to revised excise price lists was left to statutory remedies because the scheme under the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 provided hearing, appeal, revision, and further remedy, making Article 226 intervention inappropriate. Seizure of trucks and goods was treated as a separate issue and was also left to be pursued before the prescribed appellate or revisional authorities. Interim release of seized property could, however, be allowed under Rule 206(3) on bond and security, with payment of duty on the revised valuation basis and safeguards against alienation or tampering to protect revenue. en-us Tue, 27 Jul 1982 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 01 Jun 2010 18:08:53 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41295 A fiscal challenge to revised excise price lists was left to statutory remedies because the scheme under the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 provided hearing, appeal, revision, and further remedy, making Article 226 intervention inappropriate. Seizure of trucks and goods was treated as a separate issue and was also left to be pursued before the prescribed appellate or revisional authorities. Interim release of seized property could, however, be allowed under Rule 206(3) on bond and security, with payment of duty on the revised valuation basis and safeguards against alienation or tampering to protect revenue. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 27 Jul 1982 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41295