<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1982 (9) TMI 62 - HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41294</link>
    <description>Skimmed milk powder used in making ice-cream was held not to qualify for exemption under the notification limited to powder used for regeneration of liquid milk. The notification was construed narrowly: its object was to encourage supply of liquid milk, so the concession applied only where the powder was actually used to regenerate liquid milk, not where it was merely liquified as an intermediate stage in producing another finished product. The fact that the end product was ice-cream meant the statutory condition for exemption was not met, and the tariff advice did not bind the authorities&#039; independent assessment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Sep 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Jun 2010 18:06:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=79825" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1982 (9) TMI 62 - HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41294</link>
      <description>Skimmed milk powder used in making ice-cream was held not to qualify for exemption under the notification limited to powder used for regeneration of liquid milk. The notification was construed narrowly: its object was to encourage supply of liquid milk, so the concession applied only where the powder was actually used to regenerate liquid milk, not where it was merely liquified as an intermediate stage in producing another finished product. The fact that the end product was ice-cream meant the statutory condition for exemption was not met, and the tariff advice did not bind the authorities&#039; independent assessment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Sep 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41294</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>