<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1979 (5) TMI 24 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41287</link>
    <description>A statutory excise exemption notification could not be narrowed by an administrative press note, because an executive directive cannot add a restriction absent from the notification itself; demands based on that press note were therefore treated as illegal and void. The court also read the production-linked exemption broadly, holding that its wording, scheme and object covered the composite duty burden and extended to auxiliary duty of excise as well as basic excise duty. On that basis, the impugned demands and show-cause notices were quashed, the exemption was recognised for excess clearances, and refund claims were directed to be decided in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 May 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Jun 2010 17:08:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=79818" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1979 (5) TMI 24 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41287</link>
      <description>A statutory excise exemption notification could not be narrowed by an administrative press note, because an executive directive cannot add a restriction absent from the notification itself; demands based on that press note were therefore treated as illegal and void. The court also read the production-linked exemption broadly, holding that its wording, scheme and object covered the composite duty burden and extended to auxiliary duty of excise as well as basic excise duty. On that basis, the impugned demands and show-cause notices were quashed, the exemption was recognised for excess clearances, and refund claims were directed to be decided in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 May 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41287</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>