<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1982 (9) TMI 59 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41274</link>
    <description>The Court upheld the classification of stainless steel circles under Heading 73.15(2), applying a higher duty rate, regardless of quality. It deemed the retrospective application of the Amendment Act constitutional and required landing charges to be included in the assessable value for customs duty. Emphasizing the need to exhaust alternative remedies and exercise judicial restraint in issuing interim orders, the Court dismissed the writ petitions, directing petitioners to pay costs and vacating interim orders.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Sep 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Jun 2010 16:02:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=79805" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1982 (9) TMI 59 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41274</link>
      <description>The Court upheld the classification of stainless steel circles under Heading 73.15(2), applying a higher duty rate, regardless of quality. It deemed the retrospective application of the Amendment Act constitutional and required landing charges to be included in the assessable value for customs duty. Emphasizing the need to exhaust alternative remedies and exercise judicial restraint in issuing interim orders, the Court dismissed the writ petitions, directing petitioners to pay costs and vacating interim orders.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Sep 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41274</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>