<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1980 (10) TMI 79 - HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41263</link>
    <description>For ad valorem excise duty, assessable value under Section 4(a) is confined to the first wholesale cash price reflecting manufacturing cost and manufacturing profit alone. Post-manufacturing expenses and profits, including selling, distribution, freight, insurance, commission and advertisement costs, cannot be added to the assessable value. Exemption notifications issued under Rule 8 may grant relief from duty, but they cannot create an alternative mode of assessment that departs from the statutory valuation scheme in Section 4 as judicially interpreted. Notifications treated as a separate price-list based assessment mechanism are inconsistent with the Act&#039;s valuation rule.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 31 May 2010 18:40:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=79794" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1980 (10) TMI 79 - HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41263</link>
      <description>For ad valorem excise duty, assessable value under Section 4(a) is confined to the first wholesale cash price reflecting manufacturing cost and manufacturing profit alone. Post-manufacturing expenses and profits, including selling, distribution, freight, insurance, commission and advertisement costs, cannot be added to the assessable value. Exemption notifications issued under Rule 8 may grant relief from duty, but they cannot create an alternative mode of assessment that departs from the statutory valuation scheme in Section 4 as judicially interpreted. Notifications treated as a separate price-list based assessment mechanism are inconsistent with the Act&#039;s valuation rule.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41263</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>