<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1979 (7) TMI 109 - HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41247</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, emphasizing the goods&#039; Nepalese origin and lawful transit through India under the treaty. The judgment highlighted the absence of evidence supporting a change in the authorities&#039; recognition of the goods&#039; origin and ordered the release of the consignments. The court stayed the order&#039;s operation for two weeks, clarifying any further stay required appellate court approval.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 31 May 2010 16:52:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=79778" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1979 (7) TMI 109 - HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41247</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, emphasizing the goods&#039; Nepalese origin and lawful transit through India under the treaty. The judgment highlighted the absence of evidence supporting a change in the authorities&#039; recognition of the goods&#039; origin and ordered the release of the consignments. The court stayed the order&#039;s operation for two weeks, clarifying any further stay required appellate court approval.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41247</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>