<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Transfer Pricing Adjustments Under US-India MAP Cannot Be Extended to Non-US Transactions Under Section 92C</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=85743</link>
    <description>HC ruled that Transfer Pricing adjustments framework agreed under Mutual Agreement Procedure (MAP) between US and India cannot be applied to non-US transactions. The court emphasized that MAP resolutions are based on consensus between competent authorities of contracting states and cannot be extrapolated to transactions outside its scope. Arm&#039;s Length Price for non-US transactions must be determined under Section 92C and Rule 10B. The ITAT&#039;s direction to apply US MAP framework to non-US transactions was overturned as it effectively imposed a negotiated settlement where no consensus existed with other countries&#039; tax authorities. The framework&#039;s application would improperly foreclose an assessee&#039;s right to dispute TP adjustments in materially different situations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Feb 2025 08:26:51 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Feb 2025 08:26:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=797735" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Transfer Pricing Adjustments Under US-India MAP Cannot Be Extended to Non-US Transactions Under Section 92C</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=85743</link>
      <description>HC ruled that Transfer Pricing adjustments framework agreed under Mutual Agreement Procedure (MAP) between US and India cannot be applied to non-US transactions. The court emphasized that MAP resolutions are based on consensus between competent authorities of contracting states and cannot be extrapolated to transactions outside its scope. Arm&#039;s Length Price for non-US transactions must be determined under Section 92C and Rule 10B. The ITAT&#039;s direction to apply US MAP framework to non-US transactions was overturned as it effectively imposed a negotiated settlement where no consensus existed with other countries&#039; tax authorities. The framework&#039;s application would improperly foreclose an assessee&#039;s right to dispute TP adjustments in materially different situations.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Feb 2025 08:26:51 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=85743</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>