https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765974 The Tribunal overturned the Commissioner (Appeals)' decision, allowing the appellant's refund claim of Rs.82,962/-. It found that the services of the Customs House Agent (CHA) were indeed specified under the relevant notification from 01.04.2008, contrary to the Commissioner's determination. The Tribunal also recognized that additional services like DEPB Charges, Terminal Handling Charges, and Postage Charges fell under specified services. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the impugned order, granting the appellant consequential relief as per law. en-us Thu, 13 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 14 Feb 2025 08:26:50 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765974 The Tribunal overturned the Commissioner (Appeals)' decision, allowing the appellant's refund claim of Rs.82,962/-. It found that the services of the Customs House Agent (CHA) were indeed specified under the relevant notification from 01.04.2008, contrary to the Commissioner's determination. The Tribunal also recognized that additional services like DEPB Charges, Terminal Handling Charges, and Postage Charges fell under specified services. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the impugned order, granting the appellant consequential relief as per law. Case-Laws Service Tax Thu, 13 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765974