<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (2) TMI 522 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI - LB</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765976</link>
    <description>NCLAT Principal Bench dismissed an appeal challenging admission of Section 7 application. Corporate debtor argued that since financial creditor controlled majority of Project Monitoring Committee (PMC), subsequent default was orchestrated by the creditor itself. NCLAT held that PMC was constituted only to monitor project, improve sales and complete construction, not to undertake repayment obligations. Constitution of PMC does not absolve corporate debtor from payment obligations or shift blame for default to financial creditor. Adjudicating Authority correctly found existence of debt and default as per settlement agreement. Appeal dismissed with no merit found.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Feb 2025 08:26:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=797708" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (2) TMI 522 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI - LB</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765976</link>
      <description>NCLAT Principal Bench dismissed an appeal challenging admission of Section 7 application. Corporate debtor argued that since financial creditor controlled majority of Project Monitoring Committee (PMC), subsequent default was orchestrated by the creditor itself. NCLAT held that PMC was constituted only to monitor project, improve sales and complete construction, not to undertake repayment obligations. Constitution of PMC does not absolve corporate debtor from payment obligations or shift blame for default to financial creditor. Adjudicating Authority correctly found existence of debt and default as per settlement agreement. Appeal dismissed with no merit found.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765976</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>