<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (2) TMI 535 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765989</link>
    <description>ITAT Ahmedabad ruled on unaccounted receipts and payments in hotel, restaurant, and real estate businesses following search and seizure action. For hotel business, tribunal reduced profit margin from 50% to 40% on unaccounted sales, finding CIT(A)&#039;s estimate excessive given assessee&#039;s actual profit margins of 31-48%. For real estate business, profit margin reduced from 17% to 13% as transactions were mere advances without formal agreements. However, regarding unsecured loans under Section 68, tribunal reversed CIT(A)&#039;s deletion, upholding additions as no incriminating material was found during search, citing Supreme Court&#039;s Abhisar Buildwell precedent requiring incriminating evidence for additions in completed assessments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Feb 2025 08:26:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=797695" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (2) TMI 535 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765989</link>
      <description>ITAT Ahmedabad ruled on unaccounted receipts and payments in hotel, restaurant, and real estate businesses following search and seizure action. For hotel business, tribunal reduced profit margin from 50% to 40% on unaccounted sales, finding CIT(A)&#039;s estimate excessive given assessee&#039;s actual profit margins of 31-48%. For real estate business, profit margin reduced from 17% to 13% as transactions were mere advances without formal agreements. However, regarding unsecured loans under Section 68, tribunal reversed CIT(A)&#039;s deletion, upholding additions as no incriminating material was found during search, citing Supreme Court&#039;s Abhisar Buildwell precedent requiring incriminating evidence for additions in completed assessments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765989</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>