<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1982 (8) TMI 52 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41238</link>
    <description>The court upheld the validity of the Customs Tariff (Amendment) Bill No. 50 of 1982 and related legislation, rejecting the petitioner&#039;s claims of unconstitutionality. It determined the applicable customs duty rate at 230% ad valorem based on the date of bill presentation. Despite identity discrepancies, the court presumed the petitioner&#039;s importation for the case. Goods were valued at Rs. 15,000/- per M.T. due to defects. Confiscation was not enforced pending valuation disputes. The court allowed goods clearance with specific conditions, including customs duty payment and guarantees, while dismissing writ petitions against the Income-Tax Department&#039;s orders.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Aug 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 31 May 2010 15:22:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=79769" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1982 (8) TMI 52 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41238</link>
      <description>The court upheld the validity of the Customs Tariff (Amendment) Bill No. 50 of 1982 and related legislation, rejecting the petitioner&#039;s claims of unconstitutionality. It determined the applicable customs duty rate at 230% ad valorem based on the date of bill presentation. Despite identity discrepancies, the court presumed the petitioner&#039;s importation for the case. Goods were valued at Rs. 15,000/- per M.T. due to defects. Confiscation was not enforced pending valuation disputes. The court allowed goods clearance with specific conditions, including customs duty payment and guarantees, while dismissing writ petitions against the Income-Tax Department&#039;s orders.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Aug 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41238</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>