<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (2) TMI 1393 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460731</link>
    <description>The ITAT Mumbai held that no transfer pricing adjustment was warranted for interest on share application money paid by the assessee to its wholly owned subsidiary. The tribunal found that delayed allotment of shares by a wholly owned subsidiary does not prejudice the parent company&#039;s interests, and the assessee behaved commercially rationally by not charging interest during the delay period. Since the subsidiary was wholly owned, the timing of share allotment was benefit-neutral from a commercial perspective. The tribunal ruled that the Assessing Officer&#039;s adjustment treating share application money as a loan and imputing notional interest lacked legal and factual merit, directing deletion of the adjustment. Assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Feb 2025 19:08:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=797628" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (2) TMI 1393 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460731</link>
      <description>The ITAT Mumbai held that no transfer pricing adjustment was warranted for interest on share application money paid by the assessee to its wholly owned subsidiary. The tribunal found that delayed allotment of shares by a wholly owned subsidiary does not prejudice the parent company&#039;s interests, and the assessee behaved commercially rationally by not charging interest during the delay period. Since the subsidiary was wholly owned, the timing of share allotment was benefit-neutral from a commercial perspective. The tribunal ruled that the Assessing Officer&#039;s adjustment treating share application money as a loan and imputing notional interest lacked legal and factual merit, directing deletion of the adjustment. Assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460731</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>