<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1980 (12) TMI 56 - GOVERNMENT OF INDIA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41227</link>
    <description>Aluminium flattened wire was held not to fall within the tariff description of aluminium strips under Item 27(b) because its essential commercial and technical characteristics were different from a rolled strip. The authorities had relied mainly on dimensional conformity, but the record showed the goods were produced by flattening wire and were not strip with slit edges. Mere correspondence with size specifications was insufficient where the product did not answer the essential tariff description, so the excise classification was set aside and the assessee succeeded on dutiability.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 31 May 2010 13:56:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=79758" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1980 (12) TMI 56 - GOVERNMENT OF INDIA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41227</link>
      <description>Aluminium flattened wire was held not to fall within the tariff description of aluminium strips under Item 27(b) because its essential commercial and technical characteristics were different from a rolled strip. The authorities had relied mainly on dimensional conformity, but the record showed the goods were produced by flattening wire and were not strip with slit edges. Mere correspondence with size specifications was insufficient where the product did not answer the essential tariff description, so the excise classification was set aside and the assessee succeeded on dutiability.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41227</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>