<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1980 (11) TMI 54 - GOVERNMENT OF INDIA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41220</link>
    <description>Limitation for an appeal against a demand of short-levied duty runs from the date of the demand order, not from the earlier approval of the price list, where the demand is the distinct appealable decision. On that basis, the appeal was not barred by limitation and had to be considered on merits. The limitation-based dismissal was therefore set aside, and the matter was remitted for fresh disposal on the substantive controversy.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 31 May 2010 13:25:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=79751" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1980 (11) TMI 54 - GOVERNMENT OF INDIA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41220</link>
      <description>Limitation for an appeal against a demand of short-levied duty runs from the date of the demand order, not from the earlier approval of the price list, where the demand is the distinct appealable decision. On that basis, the appeal was not barred by limitation and had to be considered on merits. The limitation-based dismissal was therefore set aside, and the matter was remitted for fresh disposal on the substantive controversy.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41220</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>