<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Tug of war Between “Free” and “Restricted” Export Policy in Context with Granting of Export Incentive i.e. RODTEP</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=13539</link>
    <description>Exporters of goods designated as restricted retain eligibility for RoDTEP benefits where they have obtained the requisite permissions and fulfilled prescribed conditions; export classification alone should not disqualify compliant exporters from remission schemes, and administrative denial of rebates to authorised shipments is inconsistent with the scheme&#039;s purpose.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Feb 2025 10:16:07 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Feb 2025 10:16:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=797457" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Tug of war Between “Free” and “Restricted” Export Policy in Context with Granting of Export Incentive i.e. RODTEP</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=13539</link>
      <description>Exporters of goods designated as restricted retain eligibility for RoDTEP benefits where they have obtained the requisite permissions and fulfilled prescribed conditions; export classification alone should not disqualify compliant exporters from remission schemes, and administrative denial of rebates to authorised shipments is inconsistent with the scheme&#039;s purpose.</description>
      <category>Articles</category>
      <law>Customs - Import - Export - SEZ</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Feb 2025 10:16:07 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=13539</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>