<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Transfer Pricing Adjustments Deleted: Expat Salary Reimbursements and Royalty Payments Found Valid Under ALP Analysis</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=85712</link>
    <description>HC upheld ITAT&#039;s decision deleting transfer pricing adjustments related to expatriate salary reimbursements and royalty payments. The court rejected TPO&#039;s contention that ALP should be nil due to assessee&#039;s losses, emphasizing that business losses do not negate the value of services or technical know-how. For expatriate costs, court noted these were pure reimbursements without markup and were subsumed in commission earnings already found arm&#039;s length under TNMM. Regarding royalty, HC affirmed that technical know-how procurement was a commercial decision outside TPO&#039;s review scope. Revenue&#039;s allegation of double deduction was dismissed for lack of substantiation. The court found no basis to interfere with ITAT&#039;s conclusions on both issues.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Feb 2025 08:36:21 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Feb 2025 08:36:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=797427" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Transfer Pricing Adjustments Deleted: Expat Salary Reimbursements and Royalty Payments Found Valid Under ALP Analysis</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=85712</link>
      <description>HC upheld ITAT&#039;s decision deleting transfer pricing adjustments related to expatriate salary reimbursements and royalty payments. The court rejected TPO&#039;s contention that ALP should be nil due to assessee&#039;s losses, emphasizing that business losses do not negate the value of services or technical know-how. For expatriate costs, court noted these were pure reimbursements without markup and were subsumed in commission earnings already found arm&#039;s length under TNMM. Regarding royalty, HC affirmed that technical know-how procurement was a commercial decision outside TPO&#039;s review scope. Revenue&#039;s allegation of double deduction was dismissed for lack of substantiation. The court found no basis to interfere with ITAT&#039;s conclusions on both issues.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Feb 2025 08:36:21 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=85712</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>