<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (2) TMI 471 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765925</link>
    <description>The revisional power under Section 15 of the Karnataka Tax on Entry of Goods Act, 1979 is confined to the jurisdiction expressly conferred by the provision and by the hierarchy of authorities. An assessment order passed by the Commercial Tax Officer could not be revised where it lay outside that permissible revisional chain, and the phrase &quot;any proceedings&quot; was not treated as authorising such revision. The impugned revisional order therefore could not stand.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Feb 2025 08:36:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=797413" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (2) TMI 471 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765925</link>
      <description>The revisional power under Section 15 of the Karnataka Tax on Entry of Goods Act, 1979 is confined to the jurisdiction expressly conferred by the provision and by the hierarchy of authorities. An assessment order passed by the Commercial Tax Officer could not be revised where it lay outside that permissible revisional chain, and the phrase &quot;any proceedings&quot; was not treated as authorising such revision. The impugned revisional order therefore could not stand.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT / Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765925</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>