<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (2) TMI 484 - CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765938</link>
    <description>Regular bail under the Prevention of Money-laundering Act was refused because the record disclosed prima facie involvement in alleged laundering linked to the liquor syndicate, and the statutory limits in Section 45 remained applicable. Although the applicant relied on prolonged custody, completed investigation and speedy-trial concerns, the court found those factors insufficient against the seriousness of the allegations, attachment of properties, and indications of layering and handling of proceeds of crime. The applicant therefore failed to show reasonable grounds for believing that he was not guilty, and the twin conditions for bail were not met.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Feb 2025 08:36:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=797400" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (2) TMI 484 - CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765938</link>
      <description>Regular bail under the Prevention of Money-laundering Act was refused because the record disclosed prima facie involvement in alleged laundering linked to the liquor syndicate, and the statutory limits in Section 45 remained applicable. Although the applicant relied on prolonged custody, completed investigation and speedy-trial concerns, the court found those factors insufficient against the seriousness of the allegations, attachment of properties, and indications of layering and handling of proceeds of crime. The applicant therefore failed to show reasonable grounds for believing that he was not guilty, and the twin conditions for bail were not met.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765938</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>