<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (2) TMI 615 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460726</link>
    <description>Service tax valuation is confined to consideration for services actually rendered; reimbursed outlays cannot be included merely because they are recovered during service provision, and a subsequent amendment to Section 67 operated prospectively. Freight margin, brokerage, rebates, discounts and airway bill fees arising from cargo-space purchase and sale were commercial margins in principal-to-principal transactions, not consideration for Business Auxiliary Service. A demand cannot be confirmed under a classification not proposed in the show cause notice, and the applicable limb of a multi-part service definition must be identified. Extended limitation and penalties require established suppression, wilful misstatement, fraud or intent to evade tax; interpretational disputes without these elements do not justify them.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Feb 2025 15:23:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=797351" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (2) TMI 615 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460726</link>
      <description>Service tax valuation is confined to consideration for services actually rendered; reimbursed outlays cannot be included merely because they are recovered during service provision, and a subsequent amendment to Section 67 operated prospectively. Freight margin, brokerage, rebates, discounts and airway bill fees arising from cargo-space purchase and sale were commercial margins in principal-to-principal transactions, not consideration for Business Auxiliary Service. A demand cannot be confirmed under a classification not proposed in the show cause notice, and the applicable limb of a multi-part service definition must be identified. Extended limitation and penalties require established suppression, wilful misstatement, fraud or intent to evade tax; interpretational disputes without these elements do not justify them.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460726</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>