<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1980 (8) TMI 94 - GOVERNMENT OF INDIA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41203</link>
    <description>The Explanation to Notification No. 70/76 was construed to treat screening and mechanical pulp as alternative, not cumulative, ingredients in mixed waste paper. On that reading, the exemption benefit could not be denied merely because the mill board manufactured did not contain mechanical pulp. The notification was therefore applied in favour of the assessee, and the stated ground for refusal failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 23 Aug 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 31 May 2010 12:15:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=79734" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1980 (8) TMI 94 - GOVERNMENT OF INDIA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41203</link>
      <description>The Explanation to Notification No. 70/76 was construed to treat screening and mechanical pulp as alternative, not cumulative, ingredients in mixed waste paper. On that reading, the exemption benefit could not be denied merely because the mill board manufactured did not contain mechanical pulp. The notification was therefore applied in favour of the assessee, and the stated ground for refusal failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 23 Aug 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41203</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>