https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460716 Anticipatory bail was granted where the accused had joined investigation and the State's request for custodial interrogation rested only on an allegation of non-cooperation. The Court treated continued cooperation with the investigating officer as sufficient and held that an accused is not required to make self-incriminating disclosures merely to retain interim protection. As no need for custodial interrogation or other aggravating circumstance was shown, refusal of pre-arrest bail was unwarranted; the order was set aside, subject to terms and conditions to be fixed by the Trial Court. en-us Wed, 06 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 12 Feb 2025 19:00:27 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460716 Anticipatory bail was granted where the accused had joined investigation and the State's request for custodial interrogation rested only on an allegation of non-cooperation. The Court treated continued cooperation with the investigating officer as sufficient and held that an accused is not required to make self-incriminating disclosures merely to retain interim protection. As no need for custodial interrogation or other aggravating circumstance was shown, refusal of pre-arrest bail was unwarranted; the order was set aside, subject to terms and conditions to be fixed by the Trial Court. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 06 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460716